I was struck by this quote from a Wall Street Journal book review of the The Rare Find by George Anders:
"The real challenge may not be so much identifying talent as getting serious about seeking it. Most employers worry far more about the devastating effects of making a bad hire than about selecting someone who is competent but not exceptional—good, not great. Add to this the tendency to overvalue discrete competencies—facility with spreadsheets, say—and to discount the importance of less quantifiable traits such as temperament and persistence. Little wonder that human-resources departments extol off-the-chart talent yet often seem uneasy when it comes knocking. In many cases, it’s precisely the potential of exceptionally talented applicants to disrupt an organization that prevents their hiring—even when such disruption is precisely what a company might need."
(Emphasis added)
I think this is because it is perceived that a neutral hire
ReplyDeleteis still a better addition than a bad hire. This kind of business mindset can
lead to slow progress. However, it is still progress, no matter what. Also,
once in a while, an exceptional candidate shows up by the door.
http://traceyfieber.com/