Monday, June 25, 2012

The Real War for Talent ...I Repeat

This started as a comment on Fred Wilson's AVC.com blog post on "Retaining Your Employees"  -- a great post by Fred and well worth the read.  I love this series he is doing on "MBA Mondays" titled simply "People." As you can see my response became quite long (and this is the shortened version!) so I thought I'd better move it over to my own blog.  


If there is one area in which I sound like a broken record, it is with regard to retention.  When I hear the term "War for Talent" referring merely to recruiting and hiring I want to yell that the real war for talent is fought in retaining employees.  Recruiting top talent can be a battle but the war is much bigger than this.

And retention, as Fred points out, begins with the hiring process.  It is a much different process when you are recruiting for the long-term rather just trying to fill a job.  You don't just throw together a job description or borrow one that you found on the internet, for instance.  Also, you solicit honest feedback from your team about what it's like to work at your company and what they wish they had known coming in.  I would add that hiring for the long-term includes starting the new team member off on the right foot, paying attention to his/her transition into the company and managing the expectations of the other team members.  (Especially important if the person is replacing someone who did not work out.)  

A lot of my vehemence around retention comes from hearing every day why people are willing to consider leaving their current job for a new one -- and the few (and I might add very few) times that someone I have placed does not work out, I lose a lot of sleep and try hard to analyze the situation to determine what went wrong.  

I ask early in the conversation with a prospective job candidate, why he or she is willing to talk to me.  Sure, this is often because I am presenting a compelling opportunity, but something I have heard so often that it no longer surprises me, is that the seeds of discontent were planted early in the person's time with the company.  Since then they've been an exit waiting to happen.  Normally it is because something that was told to them in the interview process was not true or something promised was not delivered.  This wasn't done intentionally, but due to carelessness, or because there is some way in which the CEO (or whichever leader was the hiring exec) is out of touch.

I know that the hiring exec and I have partnered well and done our job when I call the new team member a few months down the road and ask if there have been any negative surprises, and the answer is "no."  If the answer is ever "yes" then the problem needs to be addressed pronto!   

6 comments:

  1. Hi Donna - Popped over from AVC.com :)


    I have had a look at some of your articles and we are small at the moment to have a recruiting problem (it is currently more a case of people saying they will work for us without reward to get in - which is a nice problem to have :).


    However, I would be very interested to here your views on intellectual freedom as an incentive for retention.


    As we start to see traction, some of our team are having "nice to stay small" feelings. Certainly finding product / market fit is perhaps the fastest exciting and most imaginative stage.


    We are tending towards putting the IT into an IP holding company and using independent subsidiaries for sales (Switzerland, Germany and England). This keeps things feeling "small" where it matters most and where resources (people) are least definable as commodities but endangers that we lose some contact with clients (though whole team will remain client facing).


    So any thoughts very welcome - and I enjoy the blog - though as I mention it's a little large company oriented for us (for now :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. In every interview I've ever conducted, I've asked a similar question to understand what is driving a candidate's departure from another job. It's great to be able to know in advance if similar disappointments lie in store for the candidate if you hire them!


    Great post, Donna...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks, Aaron.


    You raise a really good point. It is one thing to ask a candidate about motivations in determining fit, and I think we should. But a question like this gives the opportunity to observe how those motivations play out. A huge piece of recruiting for retention is finding out the person's motivations and using this to not only determine whether there is a match but also to lead or manage them once they are on the team!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi James -- I wanted to get back to you even though I want to tackle your question when I have a bit more time. Thank you for stopping by! I've enjoyed our interactions on Twitter as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree that retention starts with the interview. Also you have one critical moment of truth and that is the first day. I used to think it was cool to be totally unprepared for the person on their first day. "They are coming to work for a startup they need to have a scrappy attitude and be able to fend for themselves!"

    Dumb.

    You need to have everything prepared and laid out for them. All of the mundane stuff down to supplies. Then they can meet their group, fill out all of the necessary forms and then go to lunch with the whole team. The most important item is in the afternoon where they get a short term project that they can translate into their first "win" at the company. Something that needs to get done that hasn't because there hasn't been somebody to do it. (that is why you are hiring right?)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Honored that you stopped by Phil. The other time you were on my blog was actually indirectly when I stole a comment from you from AVC.com and reblogged it!


    That is a really great point about creating a win. Seems like that would be good both for the new person and for his/her reception by the rest of the team.


    I think this even works for senior roles -- although it may be a win achieved over a longer period of time, but still early on. Do you think it would seem more contrived at the management level?


    I am curious, why did you change your mind about being more prepared for the "first day"?

    ReplyDelete